🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, delayed for at least 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which allow for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, mentioning that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.